|
|
Should I wish to sing, dance or strip naked, should I wish to go
down on a stranger or masturbate (not that I would arbitrarily do
any of these things – well…), I could do so without
fear of censure or misunderstanding. Neither my body nor its functions
is considered shocking, unusual or obscene.
From the very outset, there is the easy, wide-ranging conversation
of equals and initiates. Swingers may talk openly of things generally
considered taboo, but there is much more that simply need not be
said. Where the sexual agenda is not hidden, it ceases to be a threat.
This is the principal problem with our post-lapsarian condition.
We can no longer play with one another when every unguarded action
or word may be interpreted as a sexual signal and sex is taboo. Every
encounter, every conversation is political, competitive.
|
 |
| |
We swingers have no such problem. Sexual signals consist
in direct questions – “Will you?” or, in Europe,
in tentative caresses. These can be rejected with a word or a shake
of the head, invariably without offence given or taken. There may,
after all, be a thousand reasons for such rejection, none of them
inherently offensive because they are rejections of a specific request
at a specific time, not of a whole person.
So it may be ‘Not just now. I don’t feel like it,’ or, ‘You’re
very nice, but my partner does not fancy yours. Sorry!’ or ‘Your
cock is too big for me,’ or even, ‘Sorry. We don’t
play with fat people’, - inoffensive because a personal idiosyncratic
preference and because plenty of other people do and will – or,
most commonly of all - ‘Look, we really like you, but I think
you’ll agree that the chemistry just isn’t there…’
|
|
|
|